AMC 8 · 2007 · #15
Grade 6 logicProblem
Let and be numbers with . Which of the following is
impossible?
Pick an answer.
Toolkit + CCSS Solution
Understand
Restated: Three positive numbers satisfy $0 < a < b < c$. Of the five inequalities listed, which one can NEVER be true?
Givens: $a$, $b$, $c$ are numbers with $0 < a < b < c$; Answer choices: (A) $a + c < b$, (B) $a \cdot b < c$, (C) $a + b < c$, (D) $a \cdot c < b$, (E) $\dfrac{b}{c} = a$
Unknowns: Which one of the five statements is impossible under the condition $0 < a < b < c$
Understand
Restated: Three positive numbers satisfy $0 < a < b < c$. Of the five inequalities listed, which one can NEVER be true?
Givens: $a$, $b$, $c$ are numbers with $0 < a < b < c$; Answer choices: (A) $a + c < b$, (B) $a \cdot b < c$, (C) $a + b < c$, (D) $a \cdot c < b$, (E) $\dfrac{b}{c} = a$
Plan
Primary tool: #3 Eliminate Possibilities
Secondary: #6 Guess and Check
The question asks which choice is impossible, so Tool #3 (Eliminate Possibilities) is the direct fit: rule out every choice that can happen, and the lone survivor is the answer. To rule a choice OUT of the suspect list, we use Tool #6 (Guess and Check) — pick concrete numbers that satisfy $0 < a < b < c$ AND the choice's inequality. To rule a choice IN as impossible, we use the basic rules of inequalities: adding a positive number makes things larger. We are deliberately avoiding Tool #13 (Algebra) because no equation needs solving — small numerical experiments and one transitivity step are enough.
Execute — Answer: A
6.EE.B.8 Step 1 - Test (B) $a \cdot b < c$ with whole numbers.
- Try $a = 1$, $b = 2$, $c = 5$.
- The order $0 < 1 < 2 < 5$ holds, and $a \cdot b = 1 \cdot 2 = 2 < 5 = c$.
- So (B) CAN happen — eliminate it.
💡 When $a = 1$, the product $a \cdot b$ equals $b$, which is automatically less than $c$. An easy hit.
6.EE.B.8 Step 2 - Test (C) $a + b < c$ with whole numbers.
- Try $a = 1$, $b = 2$, $c = 10$.
- The order $0 < 1 < 2 < 10$ holds, and $a + b = 3 < 10 = c$.
- So (C) CAN happen — eliminate it.
💡 Make $c$ much bigger than $a$ and $b$ and the sum $a + b$ stays small by comparison.
5.NF.B.5 Step 3 - Test (D) $a \cdot c < b$.
- Whole numbers will not work here: if $a \geq 1$ then $a \cdot c \geq c > b$.
- So let $a$ be a small fraction.
- Try $a = \dfrac{1}{2}$, $b = 1$, $c = \dfrac{3}{2}$.
- The order $0 < \tfrac{1}{2} < 1 < \tfrac{3}{2}$ holds, and $a \cdot c = \tfrac{1}{2} \cdot \tfrac{3}{2} = \tfrac{3}{4} < 1 = b$.
- So (D) CAN happen — eliminate it.
💡 Multiplying by a fraction less than $1$ makes things smaller. With $a < 1$, the product $a \cdot c$ can drop below $b$.
6.RP.A.1 Step 4 - Test (E) $\dfrac{b}{c} = a$.
- Since $b < c$, the ratio $\dfrac{b}{c}$ is some number less than $1$, so $a$ must be a fraction.
- Try $a = \dfrac{1}{2}$, $c = 4$, and set $b = a \cdot c = 2$.
- The order $0 < \tfrac{1}{2} < 2 < 4$ holds, and $\dfrac{b}{c} = \dfrac{2}{4} = \dfrac{1}{2} = a$.
- So (E) CAN happen — eliminate it.
💡 Pick $a$ first, then pick any $c$ you like; the equation $b = a \cdot c$ tells you exactly what $b$ has to be.
6.EE.B.8 Step 5 - Only (A) is left.
- Show it is impossible without examples — use the rules of inequalities.
- We have $b < c$ (given).
- Since $a > 0$, adding $a$ to the right side of $b < c$ keeps the inequality, giving $b < c + a$, i.e., $b < a + c$.
- That is the exact opposite of (A) $a + c < b$, so (A) cannot hold for any allowed $a, b, c$.
💡 Adding a positive number to the bigger side keeps it bigger. So $a + c$ is even larger than $c$, which is already larger than $b$. There is no room for $a + c$ to drop below $b$.
6.EE.B.8 Test (B) $a \cdot b < c$ with whole numbers. Try $a = 1$, $b = 2$, $c = 5$. The 6.EE.B.8 Test (C) $a + b < c$ with whole numbers. Try $a = 1$, $b = 2$, $c = 10$. The ord 5.NF.B.5 Test (D) $a \cdot c < b$. Whole numbers will not work here: if $a \geq 1$ then $ 6.RP.A.1 Test (E) $\dfrac{b}{c} = a$. Since $b < c$, the ratio $\dfrac{b}{c}$ is some num 6.EE.B.8 Only (A) is left. Show it is impossible without examples — use the rules of ineq Review
Reasonableness: Double-check (A) with a numerical try. Pick $a = 1$, $b = 2$, $c = 3$: then $a + c = 4$, which is greater than $b = 2$. Pick $a = \tfrac{1}{10}$, $b = \tfrac{1}{2}$, $c = 1$: then $a + c = 1.1$, again greater than $b = 0.5$. No matter how small $a$ is, the inequality $a + c < b$ keeps failing because $c$ alone is already larger than $b$ and we are only adding to it. The four eliminated choices each came with a concrete witness, so the lone survivor is indeed (A).
Alternative: Tool #5 (Look for a Pattern): notice that (B), (C), (D), (E) all let one side stay small (either by multiplying by a fraction or by setting up a ratio), while (A) tries to make a SUM smaller than one of its parts. For positive numbers, $a + c$ must be larger than $c$ — and $c$ is already larger than $b$. The pattern "sum of positives $>$ each part" instantly flags (A) as the only structural violation.
CCSS standards used (min grade 6)
6.EE.B.8Write an inequality of the form $x > c$ or $x < c$ to represent a constraint or condition in a real-world or mathematical problem (Reading and reasoning with the inequality $0 < a < b < c$, and using the rule that adding a positive number to one side of an inequality preserves the direction, to prove $b < a + c$.)5.NF.B.5Interpret multiplication as scaling (resizing) (Recognizing that multiplying by a fraction less than $1$ shrinks a number, which is the key to constructing the example for choice (D).)6.RP.A.1Understand the concept of a ratio and use ratio language to describe a ratio relationship between two quantities (Interpreting $\dfrac{b}{c} = a$ as a ratio condition and building the example $a = \tfrac{1}{2}, b = 2, c = 4$ from it.)
⭐ Adding a positive number always makes things bigger — so $a + c$ can never sink below $b$. Spot that one rule and this AMC 8 inequality puzzle is decided.
⭐ Adding a positive number always makes things bigger — so $a + c$ can never sink below $b$. Spot that one rule and this AMC 8 inequality puzzle is decided.